'If my son did what Michael Adebolajo did, I would be happy': Hate preacher Omar Bakri Muhammad says he is proud of Lee Rigby killer. Omar Bakri Muhammad said e would be 'happy' if son killed a soldier. Adebolajo spoke at radical group Al-Muhajiroun's demonstrations. Muhammad said he did not feel sympathy for Lee Rigby's family.
He said that Adebolajo, 29, was a 'quiet, shy person' looking for answers.
Muhammad said he did not feel sympathy for Lee Rigby and was 'proud' of what Adebolajo did.
The interview provoked criticism from people on Twitter who said Channel 4 should not be giving the preacher 'oxygen'.
Former MP Tony McNulty said: 'C4 interview with Omar Bakri Mohammed just disgraceful - why give this idiot any oxygen of publicity at all - total puff interview. Woeful.'
The journalist who recorded the interview, Paraic O'Brien, replied: 'Disagree. His inability to engage with LeeRigby as a human/Dad told us lots about the radical mindset.'
He also added: 'Thanks for all feedback.I know many disagree but I felt Bakri's inability to engage with personal tragedy & his online reach = newsworthy.'
As Adebolajo was convicted of murder, he refused to show any remorse.
During the trial, he told Lee Rigby’s family how he will never regret killing the fusilier because he is a ‘soldier of Allah’.
Adebolajo kissed the Koran when he and Adebowale were convicted of murdering Fusilier Rigby at the end of an astonishing four-week Old Bailey trial.
The victim’s parents, estranged wife and fiancée were overcome with emotion as the jury of eight women and four men returned their verdicts in just 90 minutes.
His mother Lyn and sister Sara sobbed as others hugged.
Mr Justice Sweeney told of his gratitude and admiration for the soldier’s family who, he said, had shown great dignity throughout the most harrowing of evidence.
Message for TJ. So you continue to lie. I’m compiling a list of you lies starting with your name, then your assurance that all articles copied and pasted are always credited to the writer. Your ridicules excuses that you DIDN’T copy and Past the Diana article. I quote: ‘THIS ARTICLE DOES CONTAIN A CERTAIN AMOUNT OF PLAGUERISM (I assume you mean plagiarism? You should have just used ‘copying or cheating’ easer for you to spell) . I USE AS ALL JOURNALISTS DO QUOTES’. You say ‘A certain amount of plagiarism???’ and ‘all journalists use quotes?????’ You must think everyone is as stupid as you are; this WHOLE article was copied and pasted. Do you remember promising ‘You’d never look at Maurice’s blog again? Since that lie you still continue quoting from his blog, copying and pasting my comments, and only yesterday you admitted to reading it. You lied about his staff not getting paid, you lied about him been asked to leave the Kempinski. The list of lies will make good reading when finished so please keep going.
ReplyDeleteAlthough you invite your readers ( all 70,000). To look at Maurice’s Blog you say Maurice wont publicise your blog because he is frightened of his readers seeing ‘The other side’ No TJ, why should he support a blog that is full on lies about him, disgusting photos of naked big breasted woman, filthy jokes and your fear and obsession about paedophiles being arrested in Spain, I think you mean on Costa Blanca if the truth be known , you know the saying ‘those who sing loudest etc etc?.
TJ you’re a liar. The only true word that has come out of your mouth is the fact that Maurice has never lowered himself into being drawn into any of this rubbish by you , not on here or not in the Olive Press. He has always risen above this and has never once bad mouthed you or your mates. After all the shit you have thrown at him NOTHING has stuck YOU HAVE ACHIEVED NOTHING. You are a jealous old man who is hoping for you 15 minutes of fame. The question I would like to ask you, what is your obsession with Maurice Boland? Why do you continue to go on and on about him which in the end goes nowhere? Thankfully no one has read any of this shit because if they had at least one of the 70,000 would have made a comment on it. You also go on and on about being sued, well one thing I don’t understand about Maurice’s is why he doesn’t sue you? I alone have saved enough crap on you that would put you behind bars for a considerable time. Only in one of today’s English newspapers here on the Costa del Sol there is a story of and Internet predator being arrested. You should be thankful everyday Maurice or someone’s parents (you know whom I’m talking about) don’t finally go to the police.
So you haven’t read the great news about Maurice yet? Tut Tut I think that just might be another like to save face. Finally TJ Please let us know what is your obsession with Maurice Boland. Your answer should at last should make interesting reading, that is if you even know why your obsessed with him.
I see I've said PAST where I should have said PASTE.
ReplyDeleteNot sure who TJ is but as you know Gary what most of the members of ACL admire about Maurice is the way he distant himself from all this negativity over the past few years, he rode above it all. I'm delighted he's returning to what we all love him doing. Happy Christmas to you and Ann. .
ReplyDeleteI remember asking Maurice once why he never responded to any of the comments about him in the OP? He told me he learnt long ago after listening to a panelist on BBC's Question Time that one should never read the readers comments that follow after a story about you in the tabloid press because inevitably they will be negative and nasty and are nearly always written behind a false name. Ever since then Maurice says he has tried to avoid reading any rubbish about him in the press or social media. Incidentally I was watching Jeremy Clarkson on a talk show the other night who more or less said the same thing. So sorry to disappoint all those who would like to believe Maurice is reading their comments, he's not.
ReplyDelete