Saturday, 1 August 2015

A big thank you to Mr G for sending me a video link called: The Most Banned Video on YouTube by A Alan Sabrosky and it left me wondering just how fucking gulable some idiots are. I called Mr G and asked him where he saw it and he refused to tell me. So here is the link... Be prepared to have a good laugh and I'll tell you why after you've listen to as much of this rubbish as possible..


Alan Sabrosky bills himself as the former Director of Studies at the U.S. Army War College. He has made quite a name for himself in recent months by first declaring himself a military expert with high-level connections in the U.S. military hierarchy, then by outrageously claiming that Israel was responsible for 9/11 and that the U.S. military knows this and is concealing it. While he offers no evidence for this, he claims that he should be trusted because of his "expertise".

The truth of the matter -- with respect to both his background and his claims -- is quite different, of course.

Sabrosky was working at the US Army War College as an administrator.
WHOOPS LIE 1 COMING UP...He never was the director or dean of the college. Far from it. According to the Press Office of the Army War College, in the mid-1980s, Sabrosky served as a civilian administrator at a research department of the college, supervising the publication of papers written within that department.
Putting it simple, he was something like a librarian, a mid-level civilian manager at a military college, without access to the sort of highly classified material of the sort he now fraudulently claims to have.

WHOOPS MORE LIES COMING .... Moreover, he worked there 28 years ago. How on earth could someone who worked on the level of a college librarian in the 1980s be privy to top secret information about the 9/11? And how on earth could he be the only person to know about it or think it worth revealing?


Exposing the Lies of Dr. Alan Sabrosky
It is time once again to expose the lies of “truthers.” Fellow Debunker 1 from one of my earlier articles, provided me with an interview Dr. Alan Sabrosky gave claiming Israel was behind 9/11in this Youtube video. “Truthers” A and B, also from another article
provided the same link. I can tell you one blatantly obvious problem right off the bat- the interview comes from Press TV, which as you see here, is an IRANIAN television station. It seems to me that an Iranian tv station pointing the finger at Israel is hardly an unbiased source- or a credible one, for that matter. Of course, “Truthers” A and B take anything from Iran ( or the media from any other country known to be hostile to the United States and Israel) as gospel truth.
At about 3 minutes and 57 seconds, Sabrosky cites a Dutch demolitions expert, Danny Jowenko, who is indeed a demolitions expert cited by AE911Truth. However, what Sabrosky does NOT mention is that AE911Truth cherry-picked Jowenko’s statements regarding the Twin Towers and WTC 7, and in the case of the latter, AE911Truth was very selective about the information they gave Jowenko. They also will not quote him on the collapse of the towers because Jowenko clearly states that the collapse of WTC 1 & 2 were NOT controlled demolition ( reference ).
Here are a few other things that AE911Truth did not mention to Jowenko, as we see from this site: 1: They only gave him a simple drawing of the column placement, 2: They did not mention “ cantilevered section to the north, or the crucial transfer trusses in the area of column 79,” and 3: Jowenko is not told about the severe fires in WTC 7 ( which was confirmed by NUMEROUS firefighters who were working the WTC on 9/11) or the SEVERE damage to the south side of WTC 7 ( any picture conspiracy theorists use to show an undamaged WTC 7 are showing the NORTH side). Oh, and if you scroll down to the bottom of the page here, you will see that Jowenko himself states that he is GUESSING.
At 4 minutes and 33 seconds, Sabrosky repeats the “ buildings fell into their own footprint” lie. Brent Blanchard of Protec, who has TWENTY YEARS of experience in the controlled demolition field ( how many years of experience does Sabrosky have in that field? Oh, that’s right- ZERO) states in his 8/8/06 article that the size of those buildings made it PHYSICALLY IMPOSSIBLE for the buildings to fall into their own footprint.
Around 6 minutes, Sabrosky claims that there were Israeli’s in the area with vans of explosives in the area and that they were celebrating the attacks as well as taking pcitures before hand- implying that they were Israeli spies. There’s just one tiny problem: Why would spies purposely do anything to draw attention to themselves. Last time I checked, spies generally try to AVOID drawing attention to themselves. Refer to and this link for further details on why that claim is a lie.
At 10 minutes 36 seconds, he claims that the WTC security was an Israeli owned company. This is a LIE. Zim, Odigo and Clearforest were indeed Israeli companies, but Zim is a SHIPPING company (source ), Odigo is an INSTANT MESSAGING company ( reference ), and Clearforest is a business and information services company ( source ). In point of fact, WTC security was provided by Securacom/Stratasec and the Port Authority ( source ).
There is also this statement by Sabrosky that Fellow Debunker 1 gave me found here: “ We are now, almost ten years down the road from the worst case of mass murder in U.S. History. There has been no investigation, (the crime scene was destroyed), no arrests, no grand juries impaneled, no indictments, and no convictions. And few seem to notice and even fewer seem to care as the nation clings to this idiotic fable that nineteen Arab cavemen pulled off the most sophisticated air attack on the USA since Pearl Harbor. “
I can spot at least THREE lies there.
Lie 1: There was no investigation. Like hell there wasn’t- we had the 9/11 Commission report, and we also have Protec, which as we see from Brent Blanchard’s article, was actually there on 9/11/01, as well as many other outside experts, such as the one found here for example.
Lie 2: No arrests. What was Khalid Shaikh Mohammed- chopped liver? He was the mastermind and was arrested in 2003 ( source ). As for why the 19 hijackers weren’t arrested, that should be rather obvious- they were killed when they crashed the planes. It’s kind of difficult- not to mention pointless- to arrest dead people.
Lie 3: The crime scene was destroyed. First of all, there were actually THREE crime scenes: The WTC, the Pentagon, and the field in Shanksville, Pa. There really wasn’t anything to damage in Shanksville, considering Flight 93 crashed pretty much in the middle of nowhere. Now, as for the WTC, it consisted of seven buildings ( source ). There were a total of THREE buildings destroyed- the Twin Towers and WTC 7. Since the ENTIRE WTC complex, meaning ALL SEVEN buildings would logically be the crime scene, then that crime scene was only PARTIALLY destroyed. As for the Pentagon, there was a hole in the wall on one side. In other words, the Pentagon was NOT destroyed- it was DAMAGED. There is a difference.
As you can clearly see, Sabrosky’s research and fact checking skills leave much to be desired. Suffice it to say, if readers will excuse my language, I’ve seen less bullshit from a bull with a case of the runs.


No comments:

Post a Comment